WIRECARD-​Scandal: Lawsuit against Auditors – What did Ernst & Young testify?

Form Class Ac­tion Law­suit » Team » Cur­rent Press » FAQ »

Free webinars on the Wirecard Scandal

On March 17 and 18 we are giv­ging two free we­binars to in­form in­ter­ested parties about new de­vel­op­ments, new evid­ence and the cur­rent state of af­fairs in the Wir­e­card case. 

Speak­ers will in­clude:

  • Dr. Marc Lieb­scher, at­tor­ney at law. Dr. Lieb­scher will re­port from his own ex­per­i­ence on the cur­rent evid­ence res­ults and eval­u­ate them for you.
  • Dr. Susanne Schmidt-​Morsbach, at­tor­ney at law, and Dr. Wolfgang Schirp, at­tor­ney at law, will re­port on the status of our law­suits and your op­tions for participation.

We­binar Dates:

If you are in­ter­ested in one of the above free we­binars, please re­gister dir­ectly via the link be­hind your pre­ferred date.

The Allegations against Wirecard AG

It came as no real sur­prise: for years, Wir­e­card AG has been ac­cused of not re­port­ing trans­par­ently. At the latest since the ac­cus­a­tions of the Fin­an­cial Times, Wir­e­card AG has not been able to rest easy. The ac­cus­a­tions of cir­cu­lar pay­ments and ir­reg­u­lar­it­ies amount­ing to bil­lions of euros could not be dis­pelled even with the spe­cial audit by KPMG com­mis­sioned by Wir­e­card. The start­ing point of KPMG’s in­vest­ig­a­tion was the al­leged in­crease in sales rev­en­ues through fic­ti­tious cus­tomer re­la­tion­ships, par­tic­u­larly in third-​party ac­quir­ing with a third-​party ac­quir­ing part­ner, pub­lic­a­tions on the In­ter­net and ac­cus­a­tions con­cern­ing ac­count­ing is­sues in Singapore.

The Result of the KPMG Special Audit

The KPMG re­port was pub­lished at the end of April, and in­stead of the hoped-​for dis­charge, KPMG dis­closed ex­tens­ive omis­sions at Wir­e­card in its re­port. The Wir­e­card share price slumped by ap­prox. 40%. KPMG’s doc­u­ments were either sub­mit­ted late or not at all. In par­tic­u­lar, no bal­ance con­firm­a­tions were sub­mit­ted for bank bal­ances in so-​called es­crow ac­counts. It was ar­gued that the ac­count­ing for these bank bal­ances was incorrect.

Now the Wirecard Bubble has burst:

In the ad hoc an­nounce­ment of June 18, 2020, Wir­e­card an­nounced that 1.9 bil­lion euro, which were to serve as se­cur­ity in es­crow ac­counts for Wir­e­card cus­tom­ers, could not be found by Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaft­s­prü­fungs­gesell­schaft (EY) as aud­it­ors. EY then no longer is­sued an audit cer­ti­fic­ate for the 2019 an­nual fin­an­cial state­ments. Wir­e­card has filed crim­inal charges against un­known per­sons and feels it­self to be a “vic­tim of gi­gantic di­men­sions”. Ac­cord­ing to Wir­e­card, it is threatened by the pos­sible ter­min­a­tion of loans amount­ing to 2 bil­lion euro. Even for a DAX com­pany, this is un­likely to be bear­able if no debt morator­ium can be agreed upon with the banks. CEO Markus Braun resigned and was re­placed by James Freis as in­terim CEO.

Mean­while, the rat­ing agency Moody’s down­graded Wir­e­card by 6 notches (“B3”, i.e. “junk level”) and has since with­drawn it com­pletely. Moreover, BaFin is already in­vest­ig­at­ing Wir­e­card due to in­cor­rect ad hoc an­nounce­ments with re­gard to the KPMG audit re­port. The in­vest­ig­a­tions are now to be extended.

Today, Thursday, Wir­e­card had to file for in­solv­ency at the Mu­nich Local Court due to the threat of in­solv­ency and over-​indebtedness. The day be­fore, it had been an­nounced that the company’s fin­an­cial strategy was to be re­aligned to­gether with Hou­li­han Lokey.

Wirecard AG is thus no longer a solvent defendant for claims for damages by investors!

How could EY not have been aware of this?

The ques­tion arises as to how EY was able to is­sue the last audit cer­ti­fic­ates without lim­it­a­tions. How could it be that the de­fi­cits iden­ti­fied by KPMG re­mained hid­den from EY’s aud­it­ors in the years before?

After ex­amin­ing the legal situ­ation, Schirp & Part­ner comes to the con­clu­sion that the cer­ti­fic­ates could prob­ably not have been is­sued without a breach of an auditor’s audit­ing ob­lig­a­tions. EY has ap­par­ently cer­ti­fied credit bal­ances in trust ac­counts of up to 1.9 bil­lion euro in re­cent years without ob­jec­tion, al­though no suf­fi­cient evid­ence could have been provided, as the banks con­cerned deny the ex­ist­ence of the ac­counts. Ac­cord­ing to our ana­lysis, this does not cor­res­pond to the du­ti­ful pro­ced­ure of an auditor.

What can affected Investors do?

We be­lieve that EY is eco­nom­ic­ally the bet­ter claimant for ag­grieved in­vestors. The fu­ture of Wir­e­card is writ­ten in the stars; the in­solv­ency ap­plic­a­tion was filed on June 25, 2020. There­fore, any­one who wants to en­force dam­ages should con­sider whether he or she wants to take ac­tion against Wir­e­card at all.

We see a pro­ceed­ing against the aud­itor EY as the bet­ter al­tern­at­ive. The lat­ter has audited and cer­ti­fied the an­nual fin­an­cial state­ments of Wir­e­card AG for many years and claims to have en­countered in­cor­rect bal­ance con­firm­a­tions for the first time in June 2020? In our opin­ion, this is not com­pat­ible with the audit­ing du­ties of an aud­itor. Only in March of this year, in a sim­ilar case, the Ger­man Fed­eral Su­preme Court (Bundes­gericht­shof – BGH) had ruled against an aud­itor for in­cor­rectly is­sued audit cer­ti­fic­ates and awar­ded the in­vestor damages.

We have already filed a first class ac­tion. If you are also in­ter­ested in a class ac­tion against the aud­itor EY, please con­tact us. As con­tact per­sons for your fur­ther pro­ceed­ings, you can con­tact at­tor­ney Dr. Wolfgang Schirp, spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for bank­ing and cap­ital mar­ket law and at­tor­ney Dr. Susanne Schmidt-​Morsbach, spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for bank­ing and cap­ital mar­ket law and spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for com­mer­cial and cor­por­ate law.

Form Class Ac­tion Law­suit » FAQ » Team » Cur­rent Press »

How to reach us

Schirp & Part­ner Recht­san­wälte mbB
Leipzi­ger Platz 9
10117 Ber­lin, Germany

Phone: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 0
Fax: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 17
E-​Mail: mail@​schirp.​com

Legal Advisory Label

Please take note that we can not answer consultatively here. If you happen to request that anyways, you may give us full power of attorney. For that, simply download this form, sign it and return it to us.


Anlegerschutzbrief 1/2021 erschienen

Die ak­tuelle Aus­gabe un­seres An­leger­s­chutz­briefes wird un­seren Mit­gliedern wun­schgemäß per E-​Mail oder Post zuges­andt und be­han­delt fol­gende The­men: Quelle: Aktionsbund

Neuer Prüfungsstandard für Prospekte geht an Anlegerschutz vorbei!

Ker­stin Kon­dert, Vor­stand des Ak­tions­bundes Akt­iver An­leger­s­chutz e.V., nimmt Stel­lung zum Prospek­t­prü­fungsstand­ard IDW ES 4. Die ge­planten Än­der­ungen sind er­heb­lich und ge­hen am Schutz der An­leger vorbei! Quelle: Aktionsbund

Leonidas Fonds – interner Ärger zwischen Geschäftsführung und der Leonidas Treuhand GmbH

Die Le­oni­das As­so­ci­ates GmbH wurde 2009 von Antje Gries­eler und Max-​Robert Hug gegrün­det. Es wur­den u. a. nachfol­gende Fonds plat­ziert: Le­oni­das 4 (Sol­ar­an­la­gen Frankreich): 504 An­leger, 12,5 Mio. EK Le­oni­das 5 (Sol­ar­an­la­gen Frankreich): 766 An­leger, 17,5 Mio. EK Le­oni­das 6 (Sol­ar­an­la­gen It­alien): 430 An­leger, 10,3 Mio. EK Le­oni­das 7 (Wasseran­la­gen): 786 An­leger, 21,5 Mio. EK Le­oni­das 8 (Windan­la­gen Frankreich): […]

POC Eins GmbH & Co. KG: Erste Erkenntnisse aus der Jahresabschluss-Durchsicht

Ker­stin Kon­dert, Vor­stand des Ak­tions­bundes Akt­iver An­leger­s­chutz e.V., hat die Jahresab­schlüsse der POC Eins GmbH & Co. KG für die Jahre 2013 und 2014 ge­prüft. Das Ergeb­nis ihrer Ana­lyse ist spannend! Quelle: Aktionsbund

Update: Wirecard AG – Live from the Inquiry Committee

On March 18 and 19, 2021, the com­mit­tee of in­quiry heard im­port­ant wit­nesses. At­tor­ney Dr. Marc Lieb­scher was there for us and re­ports live from the Bundestag.

P&R – erste Abschlagsverteilung geplant

Für das zweite Quartal 2021 ist eine er­ste Ab­sch­lags­ver­teilung für die An­leger bei P&R von mehr als 200 Mio. Euro ge­plant. Bei der GC (P&R Geb­raucht­con­tainer Vertriebs- und Verwaltungs-​GmbH) und LF (P&R Con­tainer Vertriebs- und Verwaltungs-​GmbH) können nach ak­tuellem Stand 7,5 % auf die fest­ges­tell­ten For­der­ungen aus­gezahlt wer­den, bei der CL (P&R Con­tainer Leas­ing GmbH) und […]

All Announcements »

Copyright © Schirp & Partner Solicitors | Legal Notice | Privacy Statement
Zum Seitenanfang