WIRECARD-​Scandal: Lawsuit against Auditors – What did Ernst & Young testify?

Form Class Ac­tion Law­suit » Team » Cur­rent Press » FAQ »

Free webinars on the Wirecard Scandal

On March 17 and 18 we are giv­ging two free we­binars to in­form in­ter­ested parties about new de­vel­op­ments, new evid­ence and the cur­rent state of af­fairs in the Wir­e­card case.

Speak­ers will include:

  • Dr. Marc Lieb­scher, at­tor­ney at law. Dr. Lieb­scher will re­port from his own ex­per­i­ence on the cur­rent evid­ence res­ults and eval­u­ate them for you.
  • Dr. Susanne Schmidt-​Morsbach, at­tor­ney at law, and Dr. Wolfgang Schirp, at­tor­ney at law, will re­port on the status of our law­suits and your op­tions for participation.

We­binar Dates:

  • Wed­nes­day, March 17, 2021, at 5:00 p.m., in German
  • Thursday, 18.03.2021, at 17:00, in English

If you are in­ter­ested in one of the above free we­binars, please re­gister dir­ectly via the link be­hind your pre­ferred date.

The Allegations against Wirecard AG

It came as no real sur­prise: for years, Wir­e­card AG has been ac­cused of not re­port­ing trans­par­ently. At the latest since the ac­cus­a­tions of the Fin­an­cial Times, Wir­e­card AG has not been able to rest easy. The ac­cus­a­tions of cir­cu­lar pay­ments and ir­reg­u­lar­it­ies amount­ing to bil­lions of euros could not be dis­pelled even with the spe­cial audit by KPMG com­mis­sioned by Wir­e­card. The start­ing point of KPMG’s in­vest­ig­a­tion was the al­leged in­crease in sales rev­en­ues through fic­ti­tious cus­tomer re­la­tion­ships, par­tic­u­larly in third-​party ac­quir­ing with a third-​party ac­quir­ing part­ner, pub­lic­a­tions on the In­ter­net and ac­cus­a­tions con­cern­ing ac­count­ing is­sues in Singapore.

The Result of the KPMG Special Audit

The KPMG re­port was pub­lished at the end of April, and in­stead of the hoped-​for dis­charge, KPMG dis­closed ex­tens­ive omis­sions at Wir­e­card in its re­port. The Wir­e­card share price slumped by ap­prox. 40%. KPMG’s doc­u­ments were either sub­mit­ted late or not at all. In par­tic­u­lar, no bal­ance con­firm­a­tions were sub­mit­ted for bank bal­ances in so-​called es­crow ac­counts. It was ar­gued that the ac­count­ing for these bank bal­ances was incorrect.

Now the Wirecard Bubble has burst:

In the ad hoc an­nounce­ment of June 18, 2020, Wir­e­card an­nounced that 1.9 bil­lion euro, which were to serve as se­cur­ity in es­crow ac­counts for Wir­e­card cus­tom­ers, could not be found by Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaft­s­prü­fungs­gesell­schaft (EY) as aud­it­ors. EY then no longer is­sued an audit cer­ti­fic­ate for the 2019 an­nual fin­an­cial state­ments. Wir­e­card has filed crim­inal charges against un­known per­sons and feels it­self to be a “vic­tim of gi­gantic di­men­sions”. Ac­cord­ing to Wir­e­card, it is threatened by the pos­sible ter­min­a­tion of loans amount­ing to 2 bil­lion euro. Even for a DAX com­pany, this is un­likely to be bear­able if no debt morator­ium can be agreed upon with the banks. CEO Markus Braun resigned and was re­placed by James Freis as in­terim CEO.

Mean­while, the rat­ing agency Moody’s down­graded Wir­e­card by 6 notches (“B3”, i.e. “junk level”) and has since with­drawn it com­pletely. Moreover, BaFin is already in­vest­ig­at­ing Wir­e­card due to in­cor­rect ad hoc an­nounce­ments with re­gard to the KPMG audit re­port. The in­vest­ig­a­tions are now to be extended.

Today, Thursday, Wir­e­card had to file for in­solv­ency at the Mu­nich Local Court due to the threat of in­solv­ency and over-​indebtedness. The day be­fore, it had been an­nounced that the company’s fin­an­cial strategy was to be re­aligned to­gether with Hou­li­han Lokey.

Wirecard AG is thus no longer a solvent defendant for claims for damages by investors!

How could EY not have been aware of this?

The ques­tion arises as to how EY was able to is­sue the last audit cer­ti­fic­ates without lim­it­a­tions. How could it be that the de­fi­cits iden­ti­fied by KPMG re­mained hid­den from EY’s aud­it­ors in the years before?

After ex­amin­ing the legal situ­ation, Schirp & Part­ner comes to the con­clu­sion that the cer­ti­fic­ates could prob­ably not have been is­sued without a breach of an auditor’s audit­ing ob­lig­a­tions. EY has ap­par­ently cer­ti­fied credit bal­ances in trust ac­counts of up to 1.9 bil­lion euro in re­cent years without ob­jec­tion, al­though no suf­fi­cient evid­ence could have been provided, as the banks con­cerned deny the ex­ist­ence of the ac­counts. Ac­cord­ing to our ana­lysis, this does not cor­res­pond to the du­ti­ful pro­ced­ure of an auditor.

What can affected Investors do?

We be­lieve that EY is eco­nom­ic­ally the bet­ter claimant for ag­grieved in­vestors. The fu­ture of Wir­e­card is writ­ten in the stars; the in­solv­ency ap­plic­a­tion was filed on June 25, 2020. There­fore, any­one who wants to en­force dam­ages should con­sider whether he or she wants to take ac­tion against Wir­e­card at all.

We see a pro­ceed­ing against the aud­itor EY as the bet­ter al­tern­at­ive. The lat­ter has audited and cer­ti­fied the an­nual fin­an­cial state­ments of Wir­e­card AG for many years and claims to have en­countered in­cor­rect bal­ance con­firm­a­tions for the first time in June 2020? In our opin­ion, this is not com­pat­ible with the audit­ing du­ties of an aud­itor. Only in March of this year, in a sim­ilar case, the Ger­man Fed­eral Su­preme Court (Bundes­gericht­shof – BGH) had ruled against an aud­itor for in­cor­rectly is­sued audit cer­ti­fic­ates and awar­ded the in­vestor damages.

We have already filed a first class ac­tion. If you are also in­ter­ested in a class ac­tion against the aud­itor EY, please con­tact us. As con­tact per­sons for your fur­ther pro­ceed­ings, you can con­tact at­tor­ney Dr. Wolfgang Schirp, spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for bank­ing and cap­ital mar­ket law and at­tor­ney Dr. Susanne Schmidt-​Morsbach, spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for bank­ing and cap­ital mar­ket law and spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for com­mer­cial and cor­por­ate law.

Form Class Ac­tion Law­suit » FAQ » Team » Cur­rent Press »

How to reach us

Schirp & Part­ner Recht­san­wälte mbB
Leipzi­ger Platz 9
10117 Ber­lin, Germany

Phone: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 0
Fax: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 17
E-​Mail: mail@​schirp.​com

Legal Advisory Label

Please take note that we can not answer consultatively here. If you happen to request that anyways, you may give us full power of attorney. For that, simply download this form, sign it and return it to us.


Weiter aufpassen bei POC !

Am 2. Juli hat­ten wir an dieser Stelle aus­führ­lich über die ak­tuell laufende Beschlussfas­sung berichtet. Außer­dem haben wir al­len uns bekan­nten An­legern per­sön­lich em­pfohlen, die Beschlüsse abzulehnen. Ob aus diesem Grund oder aus an­deren Gründen: Ed­mund Kock­artz und Klaus Chris­tochow­itz haben bei al­len Fonds (wie es aus­sieht nur nicht beim POC 1) die Beschlussfristen verlängert […]

Mandantenfang bei den POC-Fonds

Die An­leger der POC-​Fonds (Proven-​Oil-​Canada-​Fonds) er­hal­ten im­mer mal wieder Post von Recht­san­wäl­ten, die mit ver­schiedenen Ar­gu­menten im­mer noch für die Ein­reichung von Prospek­thaf­tung­sk­la­gen wer­ben. Weil wir von un­seren Mit­gliedern je­w­eils ge­b­eten wer­den, hierzu Stel­lung zu neh­men, tun wir das hier­mit ein­mal grundsätz­lich. Bei den POC-​Fonds kom­men als An­s­pruchs­gegner die Gründungs­gesell­schafter und die Prospek­theraus­ge­berin in Frage. […]

POC-​Anleger: Achtung Falle!

In den POC-​Fonds (POC steht für Proven Oil Canada) haben An­fang 2017 zwei An­leger (Klaus Chris­tochow­itz und Thomas Ruf) und ein Ver­triebler (Ed­mund Kock­artz) in Zusammen­arbeit mit dem In­solv­en­zver­wal­ter der ka­nadis­chen Beteili­gungs­gesell­schaft die ehem­a­lige Geschäfts­führ­erin Monika Galba gestürzt und einen sog. Re­start in An­griff gen­om­men, nachdem die Fond­san­leger auf­grund der In­solv­enz ihrer ka­nadis­chen Beteili­gungs­gesell­schaft bereits […]

Die IC Consulting GmbH und die MCE-Fonds

Die An­leger der MCE-​Fonds sind mehr­fach ge­beutelt. Aus­geschüt­tet haben die Fonds nur am An­fang. Dann soll­ten die An­leger freiwil­lig das Kapital er­höhen, um die Fonds am Leben zu hal­ten. Das haben viele auch gemacht. Gereicht hat es nicht. Dann wur­den Ende 2016/​Anfang 2017 die Aus­schüt­tun­gen teil­weise zurückge­fordert. Das sollte die In­solv­enz ab­wenden, die Gelder sollten […]

POC 1: AAA-Informationen

Lesen Sie die Ab­stim­mung­sem­p­fehlun­gen des Ak­tions­bundes Akt­iver An­leger­s­chutz e.V. zu den Beschlussan­trä­gen der Geschäfts­führung und neh­men Sie bitte an der Ver­sammlung per­sön­lich teil, oder lassen Ihre In­teressen durch den AAA ver­tre­ten. Quelle: Aktionsbund

ThomasLloyd – Zurückrudern 4

An­leger­s­chutz wirkt manch­mal im Ver­borgenen. Mit Ver­trag vom 26. Novem­ber 2020 spal­tete die TL CTI Hold­ing GmbH (das ist die Gesell­schaft, an der sich die Fonds der ThomasLloyd-​Gruppe beteiligt haben) Teile ihrer Aktiva und Pas­siva ab und über­trug diese auf eine neu gegrün­dete Gesell­schaft. Der Ver­trag wurde mit Wirkung zum 1. Januar 2020 geschlossen, also […]

All Announcements »

Copyright © Schirp & Partner Solicitors | Legal Notice | Privacy Statement
Zum Seitenanfang