Schirp Schmidt-Morsbach Rechtsanwälte – EN - Kontakt
Schirp Schmidt-Morsbach Rechtsanwälte – EN - Kontaktieren Sie uns

Contact us

We’re there for you and look for­ward to your mes­sage. This is how you can reach us:

Tele­fon: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 90

E-​Mail: mail@​schirp.​com

All con­tact information

Wirecard – Current Status of the Proceedings against EY

Cur­rent Status of the Pro­ceed­ings against EY

The pro­ceed­ings con­cern­ing Wir­e­card and po­ten­tial claims against EY re­main com­plex and time-​consuming. Nev­er­the­less, pro­gress is be­ing made, and sev­eral av­en­ues are be­ing pur­sued to cla­rify the mat­ter fur­ther and pro­tect the in­terests of af­fected investors.

The model case proceedings

We have rep­res­en­ted the model claimant since May 2025. Model case pro­ceed­ings are in­ten­ded to re­solve key is­sues con­sist­ently for a large num­ber of com­par­able in­vestor claims. Our aim is to move the pro­ceed­ings for­ward as swiftly as possible.

In March 2026, we sub­mit­ted de­tailed grounds to the Bav­arian Su­preme Re­gional Court con­cern­ing the is­sues that re­main un­re­solved. These re­late in par­tic­u­lar to in­form­a­tion about trans­ac­tions with third-​party part­ners, re­ceiv­ables, al­leged trust as­sets, rev­enue and audit opin­ions for the years 2014 to 2018. The al­leg­a­tions and the as­so­ci­ated evid­ence were spe­cific­ally linked to the rel­ev­ant state­ments in the fin­an­cial state­ments and man­age­ment reports.

Reas­ons for the delays

In a par­tial model de­cision dated 28 Feb­ru­ary 2025, the Bav­arian Su­preme Re­gional Court dis­missed the is­sues dir­ec­ted against EY in the model case pro­ceed­ings. Other claimant rep­res­ent­at­ives have filed an ap­peal on points of law with the Fed­eral Court of Justice against that de­cision. No de­cision has yet been is­sued on that appeal.

This ap­peal also af­fects other parties and delays the pro­gress of the pro­ceed­ings. Fur­ther ap­plic­a­tions have also been made, in­clud­ing ap­plic­a­tions to re­move the model claimant and al­leging bias on the part of the presid­ing judge. The court dis­missed those ap­plic­a­tions. How­ever, they have nev­er­the­less re­quired time and resources.

Our strategy re­mains to re­sume the in­di­vidual pro­ceed­ings against EY wherever pos­sible and to seek en­force­able judg­ments award­ing dam­ages in those cases.

Three ad­di­tional EY entities

Three fur­ther EY en­tit­ies have now been in­cluded in the model case proceedings:

  • EY Tax GmbH Steuerberatungsgesellschaft
  • EY Strategy & Trans­ac­tions GmbH
  • EY Con­sult­ing GmbH

Claims against these en­tit­ies may be re­gistered in the model case pro­ceed­ings un­til 28 Oc­to­ber 2026. Re­gis­tra­tion may be ad­vis­able be­cause it brings ad­di­tional po­ten­tial de­fend­ants within the scope of the pro­ceed­ings and may ini­tially sus­pend the lim­it­a­tion period for the claims. How­ever, it re­mains un­re­solved whether the model case pro­ceed­ings are ad­miss­ible in re­la­tion to these entities.

Any­one wish­ing to have a claim re­gistered should provide a bind­ing in­struc­tion by 15 Septem­ber 2026. Re­gis­tra­tion must be made by a law­yer. A flat fee of EUR 190 plus VAT is pay­able for this work. It can­not be en­tirely ruled out that ad­di­tional court costs may arise.

Se­cur­ity in con­nec­tion with EY’s restructuring

In 2024, se­cur­ity was re­ques­ted for nu­mer­ous cli­ents. This was promp­ted by the re­struc­tur­ing of EY’s Ger­man en­tity. The pur­pose of the se­cur­ity is to en­sure that po­ten­tial claims for dam­ages re­main fin­an­cially secured.

EY has not yet provided any se­cur­ity. Where legal ex­penses in­sur­ance cov­ers the costs, the first claims for the pro­vi­sion of se­cur­ity are ex­pec­ted to be filed later this year. Based on the cur­rent legal as­sess­ment, these claims will not be­come time-​barred un­til the end of 2027. There is there­fore no im­me­di­ate time pressure.

Po­ten­tial evid­ence from the United States

In ad­di­tion, it is be­ing ex­amined whether doc­u­ments can be ob­tained in the United States for use in the Ger­man pro­ceed­ings. This could in­clude in­ternal com­mu­nic­a­tions, areas of re­spons­ib­il­ity, pay­ment flows and ac­cess to doc­u­ments within the EY net­work. It may con­cern, in par­tic­u­lar, doc­u­ments held by EY US, af­fil­i­ated en­tit­ies or banks.

Such pro­ceed­ings in­volve costs and legal un­cer­tain­ties. How­ever, they may provide ac­cess to evid­ence that would be dif­fi­cult to ob­tain in Ger­man civil pro­ceed­ings. In­ter­ested cli­ents may in­dic­ate, without com­mit­ment, that they wish to participate.

Fur­ther meas­ures out­side the courts

Ef­forts are also be­ing made out­side the court pro­ceed­ings to in­crease pres­sure on EY. Dur­ing the 2026 an­nual gen­eral meet­ing sea­son, counter-​motions op­pos­ing EY’s re­appoint­ment as aud­itor were sub­mit­ted jointly with share­hold­ers at Deutsche Bank and Volk­swa­gen. It was viewed pos­it­ively that Al­li­anz SE did not ap­point EY as its aud­itor for 2026.

This is based on the view that EY must re­gain trust and find a solu­tion to the con­sequences of the Wir­e­card matter.

Ac­cess to the APAS decision

The Aud­itor Over­sight Body (APAS) has is­sued a sanc­tions de­cision against EY and former mem­bers of the pro­fes­sion. This de­cision is not pub­licly ac­cess­ible. Ac­cess to the de­cision is there­fore be­ing sought be­fore the Ad­min­is­trat­ive Court of Berlin.

The find­ings con­tained in the de­cision could be sig­ni­fic­ant for cla­ri­fy­ing the Wir­e­card mat­ter and en­for­cing civil claims. The oral hear­ing be­fore the Ad­min­is­trat­ive Court of Ber­lin is sched­uled for 7 Oc­to­ber 2026.

Eco­nomic pres­sure on EY

Ac­cord­ing to the in­form­a­tion avail­able, EY has lost im­port­ance in the Ger­man audit mar­ket. This may in­crease the eco­nomic and stra­tegic pres­sure on the firm. From the claimants’ per­spect­ive, this im­proves the pro­spects that EY will ser­i­ously con­sider an am­ic­able res­ol­u­tion of the dis­pute in the me­dium term.

Sum­mary

The model case pro­ceed­ings have not yet been con­cluded and are be­ing delayed by fur­ther ap­peals and ap­plic­a­tions. At the same time, sev­eral av­en­ues are be­ing pur­sued: re­gis­tra­tion of claims against ad­di­tional EY en­tit­ies, claims for the pro­vi­sion of se­cur­ity, the pos­sible ob­tain­ing of evid­ence in the United States and ac­cess to reg­u­lat­ory doc­u­ments. The ob­ject­ive re­mains to ad­vance the fact-​finding pro­cess and en­force the claims of af­fected in­vestors effectively.

Video­con­fer­ence 

You can watch the re­cord­ing of our we­binar from Septem­ber 2, 2026, here

Copy­right © Schirp Schmidt-​Morsbach Recht­san­wälte PartG mbB | Legal No­tice | Pri­vacy Statement

Web Design: Se­bastian Klam­mer Grafik­design Berlin

Zum Seitenanfang