The Juicy Fields Saga
In one of the biggest fraud cases of our time, namely ‘Juicy Fields’, which affects over 685,000 victims and amounts to damages of approximately EUR 645 million, we have now begun to take action against the payment institution ISX.
We have sent letters of demand on behalf of our clients, accusing the payment institution in question of involvement in money laundering in accordance with Section 261 of the German Criminal Code (StGB). As the damage was caused to German citizens and the crime was committed in Germany, German law applies.
The letters of demand have already been sent to the payment institution, and we are now waiting for a response within the set deadline. Once we have received a response, we will take further steps.
Taking action against a payment institution in Cyprus is challenging – especially considering the linguistic and practical hurdles – but we are not alone. We have already contacted the European Banking Authority (EBA), which is authorised to supervise payment institutions such as ISX Financial EU PLC. We have already received their response. They suggested that we contact the Central Bank of Cyprus in order to successfully enforce our clients’ claims. We have already done so and have received confirmation of receipt from the Central Bank of Cyprus.
One might wonder whether the Central Bank of Cyprus will side with us, given that it is a payment institution based in Cyprus. Here, one must take into account European legislation – in particular Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 – as well as the role of the European Central Bank and the Central Bank of Cyprus.
This directive must be transposed into the legal systems of EU Member States. It obliges banks and payment institutions – such as ISX Financial EU PLC – to verify the beneficial owners (KYC [Know Your Customer] check). The check requires that the actual person behind the business and controlling it must be identified. Furthermore, these obligations do not automatically end once the beneficial owner has been identified, but also include the monitoring of transactions carried out. It should be noted that the payment institution must now prove that it has taken all necessary measures. It is precisely this fact, that the institution has a duty to provide evidence, that has a beneficial effect on our further course of action.
The Central Bank of Cyprus is responsible for supervising payment institutions and banks based in Cyprus and is also part of the European Central Bank, which in turn is authorised to supervise the central banks of the Member States of the European Union.
The social consequences must also be taken into account. The prevention of money laundering has been an important part of the European debate for years, and Directive (EU) 2015/849 requires EU member states to incorporate it into their respective legal systems and to establish transparency registers to ensure transparency in business relationships. Even the mere suspicion of money laundering and the associated obligation on banks and payment institutions to investigate the facts of the case represents a considerable burden.
In conclusion, we can say that the situation of the aggrieved investors will by no means be left unattended, and we eagerly await the further action to be taken by ISX Financial EU PLC and the Central Bank of Cyprus.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at any time. If you would still like to join the joint action, you still have the opportunity to do so. Further information can also be found here.