PREMIUM SAVINGS CONTRACTS: BGH AGAIN STRENGTHENS CONSUMER RIGHTS

Ac­cord­ing to a rul­ing by the Fed­eral Court of Justice on Oc­to­ber 6, 2021, savers who have con­cluded premium sav­ings con­tracts can now de­mand money back.

This is how the judges in Karls­ruhe ruled on the first model de­clar­at­ory ac­tion brought by con­sumer pro­tec­tion groups con­cern­ing un­law­ful clauses on vari­able in­terest rates in many older premium sav­ings con­tracts. The rul­ing now gives con­sumers a tailwind.

The con­tracts in ques­tion are premium sav­ings con­tracts con­cluded mainly in the 1990s and 2000s, which con­tain clauses en­titling the banks to ad­just the in­terest rate largely uni­lat­er­ally and freely. As a res­ult, savers re­ceived too little in­terest over many years.

As early as 2004 and 2010, the Fed­eral Su­preme Court de­clared these in­terest rate ad­just­ments in­valid be­cause they were too opaque for cus­tom­ers. The banks then changed the in­terest rate clauses – but to the det­ri­ment of con­sumers. As a res­ult, the Leipzig con­sumer as­so­ci­ation has now taken legal ac­tion all the way to the Fed­eral Court of Justice.

The XI Civil Sen­ate now de­cided that the clauses are in­valid be­cause of a vi­ol­a­tion of § 308 No. 4 BGB, the chair­man Jür­gen El­len­ber­ger be­came clear to the sav­ings bank: “The sample de­fend­ant has the right to change in the man­ner of a lord of the manor by post­ing in the counter room. That is inadmissible.”

Now the ques­tion of the ref­er­ence in­terest rate must be cla­ri­fied. For the proper cal­cu­la­tion of the in­terest, the lower court, the OLG Dresden should have already made pre­cise cal­cu­la­tion spe­cific­a­tions, ac­cord­ing to the BGH, which re­ferred the case back to Dresden once again.

In the next months now thus the higher re­gional court must de­term­ine the ref­er­ence in­terest rate, so that savers can cal­cu­late ex­actly, how much money they can still ex­pect from the sav­ings bank.

The spe­cial­ized law­yers of the Kan­zlei Schirp & part­ner from Ber­lin have due to prac­tice of many years for more than 25 years com­pre­hens­ive ex­pert­ise in the bank and cap­ital mar­ket right. As a con­tact per­son for your fur­ther pro­ceed­ings, at­tor­ney Al­ex­an­dra Binia, spe­cial­ist at­tor­ney for bank­ing and cap­ital mar­ket law, and Dr. Wolfgang Schirp will be happy to an­swer any fur­ther ques­tions you may have.

How to reach us

Schirp & Part­ner Recht­san­wälte mbB
Leipzi­ger Platz 9
10117 Ber­lin, Germany

Phone: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 0
Fax: +49 (0)30 – 327 617 17
E-​Mail: mail@​schirp.​com

Legal Advisory Label

Please take note that we can not answer consultatively here. If you happen to request that anyways, you may give us full power of attorney. For that, simply download this form, sign it and return it to us.

News

POC Growth 1: AAA-Informationen

Lesen Sie die Ab­stim­mung­sem­p­fehlun­gen des Ak­tions­bundes Akt­iver An­leger­s­chutz e.V. zu den Beschlussan­trä­gen der Geschäfts­führung und neh­men Sie bitte an der Ver­sammlung per­sön­lich teil, oder lassen Ihre In­teressen durch den AAA ver­tre­ten. Quelle: Aktionsbund

Rückforderung der Ausschüttungen jetzt auch beim MCE Fonds 08

Nun er­wis­cht es auch die An­leger des MCE Fonds 08: In­solv­en­zver­wal­ter Prof. Dr. Ger­rit Hölzle aus der Kan­zlei Görg lässt über die von ihm beau­ftragte Kan­zlei Lud­wig Wöhren Schewtschenko von den An­legern Aus­schüt­tun­gen zurück­fordern. Zehn Prozent der dam­als geleisteten Ein­lage will er von den An­legern haben. Quelle: Aktionsbund

White Owl Capital (WOC) Solarfonds – Initiatoren verdienen auf Kosten der Anleger

Bisher hat­ten wir diese Beteili­gun­gen man­gels Nachfrage bei un­seren Mit­gliedern nicht näher unter die Lupe gen­om­men. Quelle: Aktionsbund

Lichtblick für die Leonidas-Anleger?

Die HTB-​Gruppe aus Bre­men, als Fonds-​Initiator und Fonds­ver­wal­ter und vor al­lem für ihre Zweitmarkt-​Fonds bekannt, ist durch Über­nahme von Gesell­schaftsanteilen in die Geschäfts­führung und vor al­lem die Anleger-​Betreuung der Leonidas-​Gruppe eingestie­gen. Hier tobte in den let­zten Mon­aten ein Kampf der ehem­als ge­mein­samen Un­ternehmens­gründer Max-​Robert Hug und Antje Gries­eler. Die An­leger der Windpark- und Solar-​Fonds beklagen […]

Premium savings contracts: BGH again strengthens consumer rights

Ac­cord­ing to a rul­ing by the Fed­eral Court of Justice on Oc­to­ber 6, 2021, savers who have con­cluded premium sav­ings con­tracts can now de­mand money back. This is how the judges in Karls­ruhe ruled on the first model de­clar­at­ory ac­tion brought by con­sumer pro­tec­tion groups con­cern­ing un­law­ful clauses on vari­able in­terest rates in many older premium […]

CJEU strengthens consumer rights: “Revocation joker” for millions of consumer credit agreements

The CJEU found that many con­sumer loan agree­ments can still be re­voked years later.

All Announcements »

Copyright © Schirp & Partner Solicitors | Legal Notice | Privacy Statement
Zum Seitenanfang